Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Olivia Gadecki vs Lisa Mays Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gadecki vs Mays analysis and find out who is favored!
Olivia Gadecki vs Lisa Mays Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gadecki 1 - 0 Mays
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gadecki has won 43% of points on their second serve, while Mays has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gadecki, in recent form, has won 56.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mays has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.08% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gadecki has saved 56.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mays has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gadecki has won 55.88% of matches played (W/L 38/ 30), with Mays winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gadecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Mays has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gadecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.78% of matches (W/L 26/ 19), where as Mays has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gadecki winning 1 times and Mays being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gadecki winning 2 and Mays winning 0. The last match between Gadecki and Mays was at the W60 Canberra, 15-03-2023, First, Clay with Olivia Gadecki getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gadecki and Mays have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gadecki winning 0 times and Mays 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gadecki winning 0, and Mays 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gadecki has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.6 while Mays has played against players with an average rank of 217.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gadecki has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mays has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gadecki has converted 43.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mays has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
170
Rank
120
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
829
Rank
594
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
46% (54-64)
53% (19-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$296,744
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Olivia Gadecki | Lisa Mays |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:0 | 0:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (22/32) | 51% (21/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (16/22) | 43% (9/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 90% (9/10) | 25% (5/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (27/41) | 22% (7/32) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Lisa Mays
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Olivia Gadecki | Lisa Mays |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (44/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (380/357) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 164 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 187.36 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1480/2387) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (972/1480) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (390/907) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (135/311) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1075/2416) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (19/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Olivia Gadecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Olivia Gadecki
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Naiktha Bains
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Amelia Rajecki
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Eliz Maloney
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Olivia Gadecki
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Solana Sierra
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Mccartney Kessler
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Olivia Gadecki
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Mays Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Lisa Mays
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Kanako Osafune
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Lisa Mays
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Lisa Mays
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Lisa Mays
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Sravya Shivani Chilakalapudi
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulia Crescenzi
Player
Lisa Mays
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Meshkatolzahra Safi
79%
(
64 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Lola Marandel
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marente Sijbesma
Player
Lisa Mays
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gadecki Vs Mays Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gadecki are available here and Mays photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
